Solo U1300 vs Ryzen 5 2400G

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 2400G and Core Solo U1300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1151not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.92no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Core Solo
Power efficiency7.99no data
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date12 February 2018 (6 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2400G and Core Solo U1300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed3.6 GHz1.06 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz1.06 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache128K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache4 MB (shared)2 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size210 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors4,950 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V - 1.1V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2400G and Core Solo U1300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Core Solo U1300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 2400G and Core Solo U1300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Core Solo U1300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Core Solo U1300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelno data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Core Solo U1300.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 2400G 8727
+6772%
Solo U1300 127

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 8 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 6 Watt

Ryzen 5 2400G has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Solo U1300, on the other hand, has 983.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 2400G and Core Solo U1300. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen 5 2400G is a desktop processor while Core Solo U1300 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2400G and Core Solo U1300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Ryzen 5 2400G
Intel Core Solo U1300
Core Solo U1300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1443 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Core Solo U1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 2400G or Core Solo U1300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.