Xeon E3-1285 v4 vs Ryzen 5 1600X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 1600X
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
8.38
+67.3%
Xeon E3-1285 v4
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
5.01

Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Xeon E3-1285 v4 by an impressive 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600X and Xeon E3-1285 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9141229
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.29no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency8.194.90
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Broadwell-DT (2015)
Release date16 March 2017 (7 years ago)2 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600X and Xeon E3-1285 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s5 GT/s
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache576 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm2160 mm2
Number of transistors4800 Million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600X and Xeon E3-1285 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FCLGA1150
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Xeon E3-1285 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
eDRAMno data128 MB
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
FDIno data+

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 1600X and Xeon E3-1285 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Xeon E3-1285 v4 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Xeon E3-1285 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s29.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel Iris Pro P6300
Max video memory-32 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video-+
Graphics max frequency-1.15 GHz
Execution Units-48

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 1600X and Xeon E3-1285 v4 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Xeon E3-1285 v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2416

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 1600X 8.38
+67.3%
Xeon E3-1285 v4 5.01

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 1600X 13056
+67.2%
Xeon E3-1285 v4 7808

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.38 5.01
Recency 16 March 2017 2 June 2015
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 8

Ryzen 5 1600X has a 67.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The Ryzen 5 1600X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1285 v4 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 1600X is a desktop processor while Xeon E3-1285 v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600X and Xeon E3-1285 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Ryzen 5 1600X
Intel Xeon E3-1285 v4
Xeon E3-1285 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 895 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 10 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1285 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600X or Xeon E3-1285 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.