Ryzen 7 PRO 44750U vs Ryzen 5 1600X
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 1600X and Ryzen 7 PRO 44750U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 914 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.29 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | AMD Ryzen 7 |
| Power efficiency | 8.19 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 16 March 2017 (7 years ago) | 7 May 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 1600X and Ryzen 7 PRO 44750U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 36 | no data |
| L1 cache | 576 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 156 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4800 Million | 9800 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 1600X and Ryzen 7 PRO 44750U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | AM4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Ryzen 7 PRO 44750U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Ryzen 7 PRO 44750U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Ryzen 7 PRO 44750U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | 73.304 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | Radeon Vega 5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Ryzen 7 PRO 44750U.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 16 March 2017 | 7 May 2020 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 7 PRO 44750U has an age advantage of 3 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 1600X and Ryzen 7 PRO 44750U. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 5 1600X is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 44750U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600X and Ryzen 7 PRO 44750U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
