Ryzen 5 8400F vs Ryzen 5 1600X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 1600X
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
8.22
Ryzen 5 8400F
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
15.30
+86.1%

Ryzen 5 8400F outperforms Ryzen 5 1600X by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600X and Ryzen 5 8400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking925457
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.5064.44
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency8.1922.28
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Phoenix (2023−2024)
Release date11 April 2017 (7 years ago)1 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249$170

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 8400F has 1332% better value for money than Ryzen 5 1600X.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600X and Ryzen 5 8400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1212
Base clock speed3.6 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size192 mm2178 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600X and Ryzen 5 8400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4AM5
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Ryzen 5 8400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Ryzen 5 8400F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Ryzen 5 8400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Ryzen 5 8400F.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes2420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 1600X 8.22
Ryzen 5 8400F 15.30
+86.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 1600X 13056
Ryzen 5 8400F 24302
+86.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.22 15.30
Recency 11 April 2017 1 April 2024
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 5 8400F has a 86.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 8400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 1600X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600X and Ryzen 5 8400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Ryzen 5 1600X
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
Ryzen 5 8400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 922 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 328 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 8400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600X or Ryzen 5 8400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.