EPYC 7401 vs Ryzen 5 1600X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 1600X
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
8.53
EPYC 7401
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 170 Watt
36.12
+323%

EPYC 7401 outperforms Ryzen 5 1600X by a whopping 323% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600X and EPYC 7401 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking907104
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.679.90
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD EPYC
Power efficiency8.1919.37
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date16 March 2017 (7 years ago)29 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249$1,850

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7401 has 112% better value for money than Ryzen 5 1600X.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600X and EPYC 7401 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1248
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3620
L1 cache576 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache3 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors4800 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600X and EPYC 7401 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketAM4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and EPYC 7401. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and EPYC 7401 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and EPYC 7401. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s170.671 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and EPYC 7401.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes24128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 1600X 8.53
EPYC 7401 36.12
+323%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 1600X 13057
EPYC 7401 55280
+323%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.53 36.12
Recency 16 March 2017 29 June 2017
Physical cores 6 24
Threads 12 48
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 170 Watt

Ryzen 5 1600X has 78.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7401, on the other hand, has a 323.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The EPYC 7401 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 1600X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 1600X is a desktop processor while EPYC 7401 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600X and EPYC 7401, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Ryzen 5 1600X
AMD EPYC 7401
EPYC 7401

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 887 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 7401 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600X or EPYC 7401, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.