i7-840QM vs Ryzen 5 1600X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 1600X
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
8.22
+568%
Core i7-840QM
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
1.23

Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Core i7-840QM by a whopping 568% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600X and Core i7-840QM processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9162310
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.50no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Intel Core i7
Power efficiency8.192.59
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Clarksfield (2009−2010)
Release date11 April 2017 (7 years ago)20 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249$568

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600X and Core i7-840QM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed3.6 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s2.5 GT/s
Multiplier3614
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size192 mm2296 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million774 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600X and Core i7-840QM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4FCPGA988,PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Core i7-840QM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
PAEno data36 Bit

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 1600X and Core i7-840QM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Core i7-840QM are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Core i7-840QM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-None

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Core i7-840QM.

PCIe version3.02
PCI Express lanes2416

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 1600X 8.22
+568%
i7-840QM 1.23

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 1600X 13057
+569%
i7-840QM 1952

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 1600X 1136
+197%
i7-840QM 383

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 1600X 4758
+358%
i7-840QM 1039

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.22 1.23
Recency 11 April 2017 20 June 2010
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 45 Watt

Ryzen 5 1600X has a 568.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

i7-840QM, on the other hand, has 111.1% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 1600X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-840QM in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 1600X is a desktop processor while Core i7-840QM is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600X and Core i7-840QM, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Ryzen 5 1600X
Intel Core i7-840QM
Core i7-840QM

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 903 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 80 votes

Rate Core i7-840QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600X or Core i7-840QM, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.