Athlon II X4 620 vs Ryzen 5 1600X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 1600X
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
8.38
+545%
Athlon II X4 620
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.30

Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Athlon II X4 620 by a whopping 545% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600X and Athlon II X4 620 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9142283
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.273.43
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency8.191.27
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Propus (2009−2011)
Release date16 March 2017 (7 years ago)16 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249$65

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 1600X has 24% better value for money than Athlon II X4 620.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600X and Athlon II X4 620 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache576 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size213 mm2169 mm2
Number of transistors4800 Million300 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600X and Athlon II X4 620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4AM3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Athlon II X4 620. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Athlon II X4 620 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Athlon II X4 620. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Athlon II X4 620.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes24no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 1600X 8.38
+545%
Athlon II X4 620 1.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 1600X 13056
+547%
Athlon II X4 620 2019

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 1600X 1135
+302%
Athlon II X4 620 282

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 1600X 4756
+452%
Athlon II X4 620 862

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.38 1.30
Recency 16 March 2017 16 September 2009
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm

Ryzen 5 1600X has a 544.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 1600X is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X4 620 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600X and Athlon II X4 620, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Ryzen 5 1600X
AMD Athlon II X4 620
Athlon II X4 620

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 897 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 190 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600X or Athlon II X4 620, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.