Apple M2 Pro 10-Core vs Ryzen 5 1600X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 1600X
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
8.53
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
2023
10 cores / 10 threads, 2424 Watt
14.20
+66.5%

Apple M2 Pro 10-Core outperforms Ryzen 5 1600X by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600X and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking910537
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.63no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Apple M-Series
Power efficiency8.19no data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)no data
Release date16 March 2017 (7 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600X and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1210
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache576 KB7.3 MB
L2 cache3 MB36 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)24 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Number of transistors4800 Million40000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600X and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt2424 ‑ 3696 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes24no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 1600X 8.53
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core 14.20
+66.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 1600X 13058
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core 21731
+66.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.53 14.20
Recency 16 March 2017 17 January 2023
Physical cores 6 10
Threads 12 10
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 2424 Watt

Ryzen 5 1600X has 20% more threads, and 2451.6% lower power consumption.

Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, on the other hand, has a 66.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 66.7% more physical cores, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M2 Pro 10-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 1600X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 1600X is a desktop processor while Apple M2 Pro 10-Core is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600X and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Ryzen 5 1600X
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
M2 Pro 10-Core

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 890 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 110 votes

Rate Apple M2 Pro 10-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600X or Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.