EPYC 9655 vs Ryzen 5 1600AF

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600AF and EPYC 9655 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Turin (2024)
Release date11 October 2019 (5 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,852

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600AF and EPYC 9655 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)96
Threads12192
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm4 nm
Die size192 mm212x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million99,780 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600AF and EPYC 9655 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600AF and EPYC 9655. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600AF and EPYC 9655 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600AF and EPYC 9655. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600AF and EPYC 9655.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 October 2019 10 October 2024
Physical cores 6 96
Threads 12 192
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 400 Watt

Ryzen 5 1600AF has 515.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9655, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 1600AF and EPYC 9655. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen 5 1600AF is a desktop processor while EPYC 9655 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600AF and EPYC 9655, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF
Ryzen 5 1600AF
AMD EPYC 9655
EPYC 9655

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 280 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600AF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 16 votes

Rate EPYC 9655 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600AF or EPYC 9655, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.