Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Ryzen 5 1600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking945not rated
Place by popularity43not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.72no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Mobile Athlon 64
Power efficiency11.25no data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Oakville (2003−2004)
Release date16 March 2017 (7 years ago)August 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$219no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads121
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s800 MHz
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache576 KB128K
L2 cache3 MB512K
L3 cache16 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nmno data
Die size213 mm2193 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors4800 Million106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4754
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR1
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 1600 12279
+2691%
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ 440

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 6 1
Threads 12 1
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 5 1600 has 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 1600 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen 5 1600 is a desktop processor while Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Ryzen 5 1600
AMD Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 5726 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600 or Mobile Athlon 64 2800+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.