Core 2 Duo U7500 vs Ryzen 5 1600

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600 and Core 2 Duo U7500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking948not rated
Place by popularity44not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.37no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Intel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency11.26no data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Merom-2048 (2006−2008)
Release date16 March 2017 (7 years ago)27 July 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$219no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600 and Core 2 Duo U7500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.2 GHz1.06 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz1.06 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s533 MHz
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache576 KB64 KB
L2 cache3 MB2 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size213 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors4800 Million291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.8V-0.975V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600 and Core 2 Duo U7500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Core 2 Duo U7500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 1600 and Core 2 Duo U7500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Core 2 Duo U7500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Core 2 Duo U7500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Core 2 Duo U7500.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 1600 12279
+3032%
Core 2 Duo U7500 392

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 5 1600 4538
+307%
Core 2 Duo U7500 1116

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 5 1600 25970
+1214%
Core 2 Duo U7500 1976

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 5 1600 8244
+842%
Core 2 Duo U7500 875

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 March 2017 27 July 2006
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 10 Watt

Ryzen 5 1600 has an age advantage of 10 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Duo U7500, on the other hand, has 550% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 1600 and Core 2 Duo U7500. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen 5 1600 is a desktop processor while Core 2 Duo U7500 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600 and Core 2 Duo U7500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Ryzen 5 1600
Intel Core 2 Duo U7500
Core 2 Duo U7500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 5748 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 21 vote

Rate Core 2 Duo U7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600 or Core 2 Duo U7500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.