Celeron 1020E vs Ryzen 5 1600

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 1600
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
7.73
+769%
Celeron 1020E
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.89

Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Celeron 1020E by a whopping 769% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600 and Celeron 1020E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9482541
Place by popularity44not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.53no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Intel Celeron
Power efficiency11.252.41
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date11 April 2017 (7 years ago)20 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$219no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600 and Celeron 1020E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size192 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data105 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600 and Celeron 1020E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4G2 (988B)
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Celeron 1020E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 1600 and Celeron 1020E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Celeron 1020E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Celeron 1020E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Celeron 1020E.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 1600 7.73
+769%
Celeron 1020E 0.89

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 1600 12277
+773%
Celeron 1020E 1406

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.73 0.89
Recency 11 April 2017 20 January 2013
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 5 1600 has a 768.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 1020E, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 1600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1020E in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 1600 is a desktop processor while Celeron 1020E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600 and Celeron 1020E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Ryzen 5 1600
Intel Celeron 1020E
Celeron 1020E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 5755 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate Celeron 1020E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600 or Celeron 1020E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.