Ryzen 3 8300G vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE and Ryzen 3 8300G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1372 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 11.39 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Picasso (2019−2022) | Phoenix2 (2024) |
| Release date | 30 September 2019 (5 years ago) | 8 January 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $176 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE and Ryzen 3 8300G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Multiplier | 33 | no data |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2 | 137 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4940 Million | 20,900 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE and Ryzen 3 8300G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE and Ryzen 3 8300G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE and Ryzen 3 8300G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE and Ryzen 3 8300G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | AMD Radeon 740M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE and Ryzen 3 8300G.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 14 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 4.50 | 8.32 |
| Recency | 30 September 2019 | 8 January 2024 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE has 85.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 3 8300G, on the other hand, has 84.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more threads, and a 200% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE and Ryzen 3 8300G. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE and Ryzen 3 8300G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
