EPYC 9655P vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.48
EPYC 9655P
2024
96 cores / 192 threads, 400 Watt
100.00
+2132%

EPYC 9655P outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G by a whopping 2132% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and EPYC 9655P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13371
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.42
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3no data
Power efficiency6.4023.22
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Turin (2024)
Release date30 September 2019 (5 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$10,811

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and EPYC 9655P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)96
Threads4192
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache384 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm4 nm
Die size209.78 mm212x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors4940 Million99,780 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and EPYC 9655P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket AM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and EPYC 9655P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and EPYC 9655P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and EPYC 9655P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and EPYC 9655P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G 4.48
EPYC 9655P 100.00
+2132%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G 6980
EPYC 9655P 155878
+2133%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.48 100.00
Recency 30 September 2019 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 96
Threads 4 192
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 400 Watt

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has 515.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9655P, on the other hand, has a 2132.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 200% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9655P is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is a desktop processor while EPYC 9655P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and EPYC 9655P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
AMD EPYC 9655P
EPYC 9655P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 139 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 13 votes

Rate EPYC 9655P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G or EPYC 9655P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.