Athlon Gold 3150U vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.37
+70.7%
Athlon Gold 3150U
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.56

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G outperforms Athlon Gold 3150U by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Athlon Gold 3150U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13611741
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Power efficiency6.2415.85
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Dali (Zen) (2020)
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Athlon Gold 3150U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier3524
L1 cache384 KB192 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache4 MB4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size209.78 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors4950 Million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Athlon Gold 3150U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketSocket AM4FP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Athlon Gold 3150U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Athlon Gold 3150U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Athlon Gold 3150U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Athlon Gold 3150U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1212

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G 4.37
+70.7%
Athlon Gold 3150U 2.56

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G 6812
+70.9%
Athlon Gold 3150U 3987

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.37 2.56
Integrated graphics card 4.50 2.98
Recency 10 May 2018 6 January 2020
Physical cores 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G has a 70.7% higher aggregate performance score, 51% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more physical cores.

Athlon Gold 3150U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon Gold 3150U in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is a desktop processor while Athlon Gold 3150U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Athlon Gold 3150U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U
Athlon Gold 3150U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 85 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 904 votes

Rate Athlon Gold 3150U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G or Athlon Gold 3150U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.