Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.55
+210%
Core 2 Quad Q9550
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.47

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9550 by a whopping 210% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13112170
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3Core 2 Quad (Desktop)
Power efficiency6.621.46
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.83 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s1333 MHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)12288 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size192 mm22x 107 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million820 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR1,DDR2,DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 4.55
+210%
Core 2 Quad Q9550 1.47

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 7234
+209%
Core 2 Quad Q9550 2338

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 1039
+181%
Core 2 Quad Q9550 370

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 2700
+160%
Core 2 Quad Q9550 1038

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.55 1.47
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 has a 209.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q9550 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Quad Q9550 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Core 2 Quad Q9550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
Core 2 Quad Q9550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 195 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1876 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 or Core 2 Quad Q9550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.