Core 2 Duo T5200 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Core 2 Duo T5200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1297not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency6.63no data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)July 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Core 2 Duo T5200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.2 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz1.66 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s533 MHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache384 KB64 KB
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size213 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data85 °C
Number of transistors4800 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.075V-1.175V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Core 2 Duo T5200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4479
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt34 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Core 2 Duo T5200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Core 2 Duo T5200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Core 2 Duo T5200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Core 2 Duo T5200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelno data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Core 2 Duo T5200.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 7234
+1439%
Core 2 Duo T5200 470

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 1039
+430%
Core 2 Duo T5200 196

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 2700
+741%
Core 2 Duo T5200 321

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 34 Watt

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Duo T5200, on the other hand, has 91.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Core 2 Duo T5200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Duo T5200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 and Core 2 Duo T5200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200
Core 2 Duo T5200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 192 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 20 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 or Core 2 Duo T5200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.