EPYC 7313P vs Ryzen 3 5300U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 5300U
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
6.22
EPYC 7313P
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
26.69
+329%

EPYC 7313P outperforms Ryzen 3 5300U by a whopping 329% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 5300U and EPYC 7313P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1082184
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.95
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Lucienne (Zen 2, Ryzen 5000)AMD EPYC
Power efficiency38.5115.99
Architecture codenameLucienne-U (Zen 2) (2021)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$913

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 5300U and EPYC 7313P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier2630
L1 cache256 KB1 MB
L2 cache2 MB8 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm7 nm+
Die size156 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors9,800 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 5300U and EPYC 7313P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6SP3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 5300U and EPYC 7313P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 5300U and EPYC 7313P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 5300U and EPYC 7313P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 5300U and EPYC 7313P.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes12128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 5300U 6.22
EPYC 7313P 26.69
+329%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 5300U 9689
EPYC 7313P 41609
+329%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 3 5300U 1214
EPYC 7313P 1598
+31.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 3 5300U 3603
EPYC 7313P 10851
+201%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.22 26.69
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 8 32
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 155 Watt

Ryzen 3 5300U has 933.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7313P, on the other hand, has a 329.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The EPYC 7313P is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 5300U in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 3 5300U is a notebook processor while EPYC 7313P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 5300U and EPYC 7313P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
Ryzen 3 5300U
AMD EPYC 7313P
EPYC 7313P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1966 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 5300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 28 votes

Rate EPYC 7313P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 5300U or EPYC 7313P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.