Ryzen 5 3550H vs Ryzen 3 4300U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 4300U
2020
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
4.68
Ryzen 5 3550H
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
4.89
+4.5%

Ryzen 5 3550H outperforms Ryzen 3 4300U by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 4300U and Ryzen 5 3550H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12851245
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)AMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency17.7213.22
Architecture codenameRenoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021)Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 4300U and Ryzen 5 3550H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplier2721
L1 cache256 KB384 KB
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm12 nm
Die size156 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors9800 Million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 4300U and Ryzen 5 3550H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP6FP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 4300U and Ryzen 5 3550H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 4300U and Ryzen 5 3550H are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 4300U and Ryzen 5 3550H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/s38.4 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 5 ( - 1400 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 4300U and Ryzen 5 3550H.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 4300U 4.68
Ryzen 5 3550H 4.89
+4.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 4300U 7437
Ryzen 5 3550H 7764
+4.4%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 3 4300U 1268
+34.5%
Ryzen 5 3550H 943

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 3 4300U 3396
+18.7%
Ryzen 5 3550H 2862

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 3 4300U 6068
Ryzen 5 3550H 7174
+18.2%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 3 4300U 563
Ryzen 5 3550H 742
+31.9%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 3 4300U 164
+13.8%
Ryzen 5 3550H 144

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 3 4300U 3.2
Ryzen 5 3550H 4.7
+46.9%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 3 4300U 2397
Ryzen 5 3550H 2929
+22.2%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 3 4300U 35
Ryzen 5 3550H 44
+26.6%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 3 4300U 172
+17.4%
Ryzen 5 3550H 147

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 3 4300U 3439
+4.8%
Ryzen 5 3550H 3281

Blender(-)

Ryzen 3 4300U 888
+34.7%
Ryzen 5 3550H 659

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 3 4300U 1047
+16.4%
Ryzen 5 3550H 899

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 3 4300U 4064
+14.5%
Ryzen 5 3550H 3548

7-Zip

Ryzen 3 4300U 15824
Ryzen 5 3550H 17978
+13.6%

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 3 4300U 194
+19.8%
Ryzen 5 3550H 162

CrossMark Overall

Ryzen 3 4300U 871
+4.7%
Ryzen 5 3550H 832

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Ryzen 3 4300U 13134
Ryzen 5 3550H 14437
+9.9%

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Ryzen 3 4300U 4042
+20.5%
Ryzen 5 3550H 3353

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ryzen 3 4300U 152
+22.5%
Ryzen 5 3550H 124

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ryzen 3 4300U 1414
+9%
Ryzen 5 3550H 1297

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.68 4.89
Integrated graphics card 4.65 4.51
Recency 6 January 2020 6 January 2019
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 3 4300U has 3.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 3550H, on the other hand, has a 4.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 3 4300U and Ryzen 5 3550H.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 4300U and Ryzen 5 3550H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
Ryzen 3 4300U
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
Ryzen 5 3550H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 961 vote

Rate Ryzen 3 4300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2859 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3550H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 4300U or Ryzen 5 3550H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.