EPYC 7502 vs Ryzen 3 4300U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 4300U
2020
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
4.86
EPYC 7502
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
31.35
+545%

EPYC 7502 outperforms Ryzen 3 4300U by a whopping 545% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 4300U and EPYC 7502 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1269136
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.54
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)AMD EPYC
Power efficiency17.7315.88
Architecture codenameRenoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,600

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 4300U and EPYC 7502 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.35 GHz
Multiplier2725
L1 cache128K (per core)2 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)16 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size156 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors9800 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 4300U and EPYC 7502 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFP6TR4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 4300U and EPYC 7502. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 4300U and EPYC 7502 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 4300U and EPYC 7502. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 4300U and EPYC 7502.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 4300U 4.86
EPYC 7502 31.35
+545%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 4300U 7431
EPYC 7502 47983
+546%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.86 31.35
Recency 6 January 2020 7 August 2019
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 4 64
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 180 Watt

Ryzen 3 4300U has an age advantage of 4 months, and 1100% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7502, on the other hand, has a 545.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

The EPYC 7502 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 4300U in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 3 4300U is a notebook processor while EPYC 7502 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 4300U and EPYC 7502, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
Ryzen 3 4300U
AMD EPYC 7502
EPYC 7502

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 953 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 4300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7502 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 4300U or EPYC 7502, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.