Apple M1 Max vs Ryzen 3 3350U

Place in the ranking	1483	524
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)	Apple M-Series
Power efficiency	23.10	no data
Architecture codename	Zen+ (2018−2019)	no data
Release date	6 January 2019 (5 years ago)	18 October 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 3350U and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	10 (Deca-Core)
Threads	4	10
Base clock speed	2.1 GHz	2.06 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.5 GHz	3.22 GHz
L1 cache	384 KB	2.9 MB
L2 cache	2 MB	28 MB
L3 cache	4 MB	48 MB
Chip lithography	12 nm	5 nm
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	no data
Number of transistors	4500 Million	57000 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 3350U and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	AM4	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	2060 ‑ 3220 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3350U and Apple M1 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions

XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT

no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare

AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 3350U 3.80

Apple M1 Max 14.43
+280%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 3350U 5813

Apple M1 Max 22078
+280%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 3 3350U 2455

Apple M1 Max 12697
+417%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.80	14.43
Recency	6 January 2019	18 October 2021
Physical cores	4	10
Threads	4	10
Chip lithography	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	2060 Watt

Ryzen 3 3350U has 13633.3% lower power consumption.

Apple M1 Max, on the other hand, has a 279.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M1 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 3350U in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3350U and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.