PRO A10-8750B vs Ryzen 3 3300U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 3300U
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.71
+93.2%

Ryzen 3 3300U outperforms PRO A10-8750B by an impressive 93% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 3300U and PRO A10-8750B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15051981
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3no data
Power efficiency22.551.84
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2022)Godaveri (2014−2016)
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)29 September 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 3300U and PRO A10-8750B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache384 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB4096 KB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography12 nm28 nm
Die size209.78 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors4940 Million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 3300U and PRO A10-8750B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3300U and PRO A10-8750B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
HSA-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3300U and PRO A10-8750B are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3300U and PRO A10-8750B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3-2133
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data8
Number of pipelinesno data512
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 3 3300U and PRO A10-8750B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 3 3300U and PRO A10-8750B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3300U and PRO A10-8750B.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 3300U 3.71
+93.2%
PRO A10-8750B 1.92

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 3300U 5679
+93.5%
PRO A10-8750B 2935

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.71 1.92
Recency 6 January 2019 29 September 2015
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 95 Watt

Ryzen 3 3300U has a 93.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 3300U is our recommended choice as it beats the PRO A10-8750B in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 3 3300U is a notebook processor while PRO A10-8750B is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3300U and PRO A10-8750B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 3300U
Ryzen 3 3300U
AMD PRO A10-8750B
PRO A10-8750B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 216 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 56 votes

Rate PRO A10-8750B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 3300U or PRO A10-8750B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.