Xeon Gold 6338T vs Ryzen 3 3300
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 3 3300 and Xeon Gold 6338T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
Release date | March 2019 (5 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 3300 and Xeon Gold 6338T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
Threads | no data | 48 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 36 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 87 °C |
Number of transistors | 4800 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 3300 and Xeon Gold 6338T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
Socket | AM4 | FCLGA4189 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 165 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3300 and Xeon Gold 6338T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 3 3300 and Xeon Gold 6338T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3300 and Xeon Gold 6338T are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3300 and Xeon Gold 6338T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-3200 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 6 TB |
Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3300 and Xeon Gold 6338T.
PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 6 | 24 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 165 Watt |
Ryzen 3 3300 has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 230% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 6338T, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 3 3300 and Xeon Gold 6338T. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 3 3300 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6338T is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3300 and Xeon Gold 6338T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.