Xeon Gold 6328H vs Ryzen 3 3300
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 3 3300 and Xeon Gold 6328H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Cooper Lake-SP (2021) |
| Release date | March 2019 (5 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 3300 and Xeon Gold 6328H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 32 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 22 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Number of transistors | 4800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 3300 and Xeon Gold 6328H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 4 |
| Socket | AM4 | FCLGA4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 165 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3300 and Xeon Gold 6328H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 3 3300 and Xeon Gold 6328H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3300 and Xeon Gold 6328H are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3300 and Xeon Gold 6328H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 RDIMM |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1.12 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3300 and Xeon Gold 6328H.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 6 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 165 Watt |
Ryzen 3 3300 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 230% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 6328H, on the other hand, has 166.7% more physical cores.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 3 3300 and Xeon Gold 6328H. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 3 3300 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6328H is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3300 and Xeon Gold 6328H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
