N200 vs Ryzen 3 3250U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 3250U
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.40

N200 outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 3250U and N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17831613
Place by popularity80not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3no data
Power efficiency15.1450.47
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2022)no data
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years ago)1 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 3250U and N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads44
Base clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache192 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nmno data
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors4500 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 3250U and N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP5no data
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3250U and N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3250U and N200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3250U and N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3250U and N200.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 3250U 2.40
N200 3.20
+33.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 3250U 3812
N200 5083
+33.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.40 3.20
Recency 6 January 2020 1 January 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 6 Watt

N200 has a 33.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 150% lower power consumption.

The N200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 3250U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3250U and N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Ryzen 3 3250U
Intel N200
N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2148 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3250U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 39 votes

Rate N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 3250U or N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.