i5-13400E vs Ryzen 3 3250U

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 3250U and Core i5-13400E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1770not rated
Place by popularity96not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3no data
Power efficiency15.14no data
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2022)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 3250U and Core i5-13400E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.6 GHz
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache128K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm10 nm
Die size246 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors4500 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 3250U and Core i5-13400E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP51700
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3250U and Core i5-13400E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 3250U and Core i5-13400E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3250U and Core i5-13400E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3250U and Core i5-13400E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 730

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3250U and Core i5-13400E.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 3 3250U 749
i5-13400E 1325
+76.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 3 3250U 1456
i5-13400E 8823
+506%

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 2.98 4.16
Recency 6 January 2020 4 January 2023
Physical cores 2 10
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 3 3250U has 333.3% lower power consumption.

i5-13400E, on the other hand, has 39.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, 400% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 3 3250U and Core i5-13400E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Ryzen 3 3250U is a notebook processor while Core i5-13400E is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3250U and Core i5-13400E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Ryzen 3 3250U
Intel Core i5-13400E
Core i5-13400E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2117 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3250U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3 votes

Rate Core i5-13400E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 3250U or Core i5-13400E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.