Ryzen 5 7640HS vs Ryzen 3 3200U

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 3200U
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.38
Ryzen 5 7640HS
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 35 Watt
14.48
+508%

Ryzen 5 7640HS outperforms Ryzen 3 3200U by a whopping 508% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 3200U and Ryzen 5 7640HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1775491
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3no data
Power efficiency15.0239.15
Architecture codenamePicasso-U (Zen) (2019)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 3200U and Ryzen 5 7640HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed2.6 GHz4.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz5 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache128K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm4 nm
Die size246 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors4940 Million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 3200U and Ryzen 5 7640HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5FP8
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3200U and Ryzen 5 7640HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMERyzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3200U and Ryzen 5 7640HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3200U and Ryzen 5 7640HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3AMD Radeon 760M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3200U and Ryzen 5 7640HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1220

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 3200U 2.38
Ryzen 5 7640HS 14.48
+508%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 3200U 3786
Ryzen 5 7640HS 23006
+508%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 3 3200U 784
Ryzen 5 7640HS 2292
+192%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 3 3200U 1507
Ryzen 5 7640HS 9163
+508%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 3 3200U 334
Ryzen 5 7640HS 2079
+522%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 3 3200U 129
Ryzen 5 7640HS 271
+110%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 3 3200U 1652
Ryzen 5 7640HS 9355
+466%

Blender(-)

Ryzen 3 3200U 1485
+506%
Ryzen 5 7640HS 245

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 3 3200U 797
Ryzen 5 7640HS 1941
+144%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 3 3200U 3372
Ryzen 5 7640HS 6465
+91.7%

7-Zip

Ryzen 3 3200U 9082
Ryzen 5 7640HS 54954
+505%

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 3 3200U 139
Ryzen 5 7640HS 316
+127%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.38 14.48
Integrated graphics card 2.98 14.92
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 3 3200U has 133.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 7640HS, on the other hand, has a 508.4% higher aggregate performance score, 400.7% faster integrated GPU, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 200% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 7640HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 3200U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3200U and Ryzen 5 7640HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
Ryzen 3 3200U
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
Ryzen 5 7640HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1456 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3200U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 480 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7640HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 3200U or Ryzen 5 7640HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.