Athlon X4 840 vs Ryzen 3 3200G

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 3200G
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.49
+115%
Athlon X4 840
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.09

Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Athlon X4 840 by a whopping 115% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 3200G and Athlon X4 840 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13121873
Place by popularity29not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.90no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 34x Athlon
Power efficiency6.543.04
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2022)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date12 June 2019 (5 years ago)August 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 3200G and Athlon X4 840 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache384 KB256K
L2 cache2 MB4 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography12 nm28 nm
Die size209.78 mm2245 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors4940 Million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 3200G and Athlon X4 840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4Socket FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Athlon X4 840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Athlon X4 840 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Athlon X4 840. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Athlon X4 840.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 3200G 4.49
+115%
Athlon X4 840 2.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 3200G 7129
+114%
Athlon X4 840 3325

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 3 3200G 1076
+141%
Athlon X4 840 447

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 3 3200G 3066
+175%
Athlon X4 840 1113

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.49 2.09
Recency 12 June 2019 on August 2014
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm

Ryzen 3 3200G has a 114.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 3 3200G is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X4 840 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3200G and Athlon X4 840, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Ryzen 3 3200G
AMD Athlon X4 840
Athlon X4 840

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3109 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 618 votes

Rate Athlon X4 840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 3200G or Athlon X4 840, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.