Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U vs Ryzen 3 2300X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 2300X
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.79
+1.3%
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.73

Ryzen 3 2300X outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 2300X and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12511262
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3AMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency6.9429.72
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date10 September 2018 (6 years ago)8 April 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 2300X and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3523
L1 cache384 KB384 KB
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cache8 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm12 nm
Die size213 mm2209.78 mm2
Number of transistors4800 Million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 2300X and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4FP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2300X and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 2300X and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2300X and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon RX Vega 10

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 2300X and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2012

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 2300X 4.79
+1.3%
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U 4.73

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 2300X 7574
+1.3%
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U 7479

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 3 2300X 1222
+29.3%
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U 945

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 3 2300X 3395
+11.6%
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U 3043

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.79 4.73
Recency 10 September 2018 8 April 2019
Threads 4 8
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 3 2300X has a 1.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, 100% more threads, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 3 2300X and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U.

Note that Ryzen 3 2300X is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 2300X and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 2300X
Ryzen 3 2300X
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 159 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 2300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 139 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 2300X or Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.