Ryzen 5 5625C vs Ryzen 3 2300U
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 3 2300U and Ryzen 5 5625C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1529 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) |
| Power efficiency | 22.02 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raven Ridge (2017−2018) | Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 26 October 2017 (7 years ago) | 5 May 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 2300U and Ryzen 5 5625C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Multiplier | 20 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | 180 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4950 Million | 10,700 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 2300U and Ryzen 5 5625C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | FP5 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2300U and Ryzen 5 5625C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 2300U and Ryzen 5 5625C are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2300U and Ryzen 5 5625C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz) | AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1800 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 2300U and Ryzen 5 5625C.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 3.04 | 7.46 |
| Recency | 26 October 2017 | 5 May 2022 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 6 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Ryzen 5 5625C has 145.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 3 2300U and Ryzen 5 5625C. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 2300U and Ryzen 5 5625C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
