Atom 330 vs Ryzen 3 2200U

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 2200U and Atom 330 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1815not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3Intel Atom
Power efficiency14.22no data
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Diamondville (2008−2009)
Release date8 January 2018 (6 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$43

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 2200U and Atom 330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data533.33 MT/s
Multiplier2512
L1 cache192 KB112 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size209.78 mm251.9276 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data85 °C
Number of transistors4950 Million94 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 2200U and Atom 330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP5PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Atom 330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 2200U and Atom 330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Atom 330 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Atom 330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelno data
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Atom 330.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 2200U 3583
+887%
Atom 330 363

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 3 2200U 3978
+634%
Atom 330 542

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 3 2200U 7776
+408%
Atom 330 1530

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 3 2200U 3387
+311%
Atom 330 825

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 3 2200U 14.27
+716%
Atom 330 116.45

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2018 2 April 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 8 Watt

Ryzen 3 2200U has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Atom 330, on the other hand, has 87.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 3 2200U and Atom 330. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 2200U and Atom 330, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
Ryzen 3 2200U
Intel Atom 330
Atom 330

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 535 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 2200U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 64 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 2200U or Atom 330, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.