i5-10400F vs Ryzen 3 2200GE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 2200GE
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
3.90
Core i5-10400F
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
8.51
+118%

Core i5-10400F outperforms Ryzen 3 2200GE by a whopping 118% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 2200GE and Core i5-10400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1469913
Place by popularitynot in top-10012
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data23.17
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3no data
Power efficiency10.1611.94
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date19 April 2018 (6 years ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$155

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 2200GE and Core i5-10400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache384 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size209.78 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors4950 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 2200GE and Core i5-10400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2200GE and Core i5-10400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 2200GE and Core i5-10400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 2200GE and Core i5-10400F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2200GE and Core i5-10400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s41.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 2200GE and Core i5-10400F.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 2200GE 3.90
i5-10400F 8.51
+118%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 2200GE 5963
i5-10400F 13029
+118%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.90 8.51
Recency 19 April 2018 30 April 2020
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 3 2200GE has 85.7% lower power consumption.

i5-10400F, on the other hand, has a 118.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

The Core i5-10400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 2200GE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 2200GE and Core i5-10400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE
Ryzen 3 2200GE
Intel Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 36 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 2200GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 13473 votes

Rate Core i5-10400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 2200GE or Core i5-10400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.