Celeron N2930 vs Ryzen 3 2200GE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 2200GE
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
3.83
+489%
Celeron N2930
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 7 Watt
0.65

Ryzen 3 2200GE outperforms Celeron N2930 by a whopping 489% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 2200GE and Celeron N2930 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14722756
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3Intel Celeron
Power efficiency10.168.62
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date19 April 2018 (6 years ago)23 February 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 2200GE and Celeron N2930 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.2 GHz1.83 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.16 GHz
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache384 KB56K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size209.78 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors4950 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 2200GE and Celeron N2930 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2200GE and Celeron N2930. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+
RSTno data-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 2200GE and Celeron N2930 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 2200GE and Celeron N2930 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2200GE and Celeron N2930. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data854 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 3 2200GE and Celeron N2930 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 2200GE and Celeron N2930.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes124
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 2200GE 3.83
+489%
Celeron N2930 0.65

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 2200GE 5963
+488%
Celeron N2930 1014

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.83 0.65
Recency 19 April 2018 23 February 2014
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 7 Watt

Ryzen 3 2200GE has a 489.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron N2930, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 2200GE is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2930 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 2200GE is a desktop processor while Celeron N2930 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 2200GE and Celeron N2930, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE
Ryzen 3 2200GE
Intel Celeron N2930
Celeron N2930

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 36 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 2200GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 56 votes

Rate Celeron N2930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 2200GE or Celeron N2930, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.