Atom x5-E3940 vs Ryzen 3 2200G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 2200G
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.25
+246%
Atom x5-E3940
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 9 Watt
1.23

Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Atom x5-E3940 by a whopping 246% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 2200G and Atom x5-E3940 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13782324
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.79no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 35x Intel Atom
Power efficiency6.1911.64
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release date8 January 2018 (6 years ago)26 October 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 2200G and Atom x5-E3940 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz1.6 GHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache384 KB56K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size209.78 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data103 °C
Number of transistors4950 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 2200G and Atom x5-E3940 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4Intel BGA 1296
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt9.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Atom x5-E3940. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 2200G and Atom x5-E3940 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Atom x5-E3940 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Atom x5-E3940. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3-1866
Maximum memory size64 GB8 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 500

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Atom x5-E3940.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes124

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 2200G 4.25
+246%
Atom x5-E3940 1.23

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 2200G 6754
+246%
Atom x5-E3940 1953

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.25 1.23
Integrated graphics card 4.51 0.77
Recency 8 January 2018 26 October 2016
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 9 Watt

Ryzen 3 2200G has a 245.5% higher aggregate performance score, 485.7% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 1 year.

Atom x5-E3940, on the other hand, has 622.2% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 2200G is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-E3940 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 2200G is a desktop processor while Atom x5-E3940 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 2200G and Atom x5-E3940, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Ryzen 3 2200G
Intel Atom x5-E3940
Atom x5-E3940

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2329 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 2200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 7 votes

Rate Atom x5-E3940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 2200G or Atom x5-E3940, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.