Xeon X5698 vs Ryzen 3 1200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 1200
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.05
+85.8%
Xeon X5698
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 130 Watt
2.18

Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms Xeon X5698 by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon X5698 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14061842
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.13no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3no data
Power efficiency5.871.58
Architecture codenameSummit Ridge (Zen) (2017)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)14 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon X5698 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.1 GHz4.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier31no data
L1 cache384 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)12288 KB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size213 mm2239 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors4800 Million1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon X5698 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM41366
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon X5698. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHAno data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon X5698 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon X5698 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon X5698. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon X5698.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 1200 4.05
+85.8%
Xeon X5698 2.18

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 1200 6407
+85.9%
Xeon X5698 3447

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.05 2.18
Recency 27 July 2017 14 February 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 130 Watt

Ryzen 3 1200 has a 85.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 1200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5698 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 1200 is a desktop processor while Xeon X5698 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon X5698, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 1200
Ryzen 3 1200
Intel Xeon X5698
Xeon X5698

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2789 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 7 votes

Rate Xeon X5698 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 1200 or Xeon X5698, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.