Xeon E7-8890 v4 vs Ryzen 3 1200

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 1200
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.03
+212%
Xeon E7-8890 v4
2016
24 cores / 48 threads, 165 Watt
1.29

Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms Xeon E7-8890 v4 by a whopping 212% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon E7-8890 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14082271
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.080.01
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3Intel Xeon E7
Power efficiency5.870.74
Architecture codenameSummit Ridge (Zen) (2017)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109$7,174

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 1200 has 40700% better value for money than Xeon E7-8890 v4.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon E7-8890 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads448
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeno dataQPI
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s3 × 9.6 GT/s
Multiplier31no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)6 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)60 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °C79 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon E7-8890 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)8 (Multiprocessor)
SocketAM4FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon E7-8890 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHAIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data46 Bit

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon E7-8890 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon E7-8890 v4 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon E7-8890 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size64 GB3 TB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s85 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon E7-8890 v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2032

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 1200 4.03
+212%
Xeon E7-8890 v4 1.29

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 1200 6407
+212%
Xeon E7-8890 v4 2054

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.03 1.29
Recency 27 July 2017 20 June 2016
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 48
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 165 Watt

Ryzen 3 1200 has a 212.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 153.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon E7-8890 v4, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

The Ryzen 3 1200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E7-8890 v4 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 1200 is a desktop processor while Xeon E7-8890 v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon E7-8890 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 1200
Ryzen 3 1200
Intel Xeon E7-8890 v4
Xeon E7-8890 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2796 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 28 votes

Rate Xeon E7-8890 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 1200 or Xeon E7-8890 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.