Xeon 2.8 vs Ryzen 3 1200
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon 2.8 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1403 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.28 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | no data |
Power efficiency | 5.88 | no data |
Architecture codename | Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017) | Paxville (2002−2005) |
Release date | 27 July 2017 (7 years ago) | September 2002 (22 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon 2.8 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 3.1 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 31 | no data |
L1 cache | 384 KB | 16 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 512K |
L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Die size | 213 mm2 | 217 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 4800 Million | 200 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon 2.8 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 |
Socket | AM4 | 604 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 135 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon 2.8. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon 2.8 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon 2.8. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon 2.8.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 135 Watt |
Ryzen 3 1200 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 107.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon 2.8. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 3 1200 is a desktop processor while Xeon 2.8 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 1200 and Xeon 2.8, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.