Athlon II X2 280 vs Ryzen 3 1200

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 1200
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.03
+374%
Athlon II X2 280
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.85

Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms Athlon II X2 280 by a whopping 374% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 1200 and Athlon II X2 280 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14082560
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.194.52
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3no data
Power efficiency5.871.24
Architecture codenameSummit Ridge (Zen) (2017)Regor (2009−2013)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)6 February 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109$100

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon II X2 280 has 8% better value for money than Ryzen 3 1200.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 1200 and Athlon II X2 280 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier31no data
L1 cache96K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size192 mm2117 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors4,800 million410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 1200 and Athlon II X2 280 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4AM3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Athlon II X2 280. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHAno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Athlon II X2 280 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Athlon II X2 280. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Athlon II X2 280.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 1200 4.03
+374%
Athlon II X2 280 0.85

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 1200 6407
+373%
Athlon II X2 280 1355

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 3 1200 996
+123%
Athlon II X2 280 446

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 3 1200 2851
+247%
Athlon II X2 280 821

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.03 0.85
Recency 27 July 2017 6 February 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm

Ryzen 3 1200 has a 374.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 3 1200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X2 280 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 1200 and Athlon II X2 280, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 1200
Ryzen 3 1200
AMD Athlon II X2 280
Athlon II X2 280

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2801 vote

Rate Ryzen 3 1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 54 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 1200 or Athlon II X2 280, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.