Xeon X5355 vs Processor N200
Aggregate performance score
Processor N200 outperforms Xeon X5355 by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Processor N200 and Xeon X5355 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2109 | 2279 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.05 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Alder Lake-N | no data |
| Power efficiency | 24.61 | 1.01 |
| Architecture codename | Alder Lake-N (2023) | Clovertown (2006−2007) |
| Release date | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 14 November 2006 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $193 | $1,172 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Processor N200 and Xeon X5355 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 0.1 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 0.67 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 4 MB (per die) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 8 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 143 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 63 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 582 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1V-1.5V |
Compatibility
Information on Processor N200 and Xeon X5355 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | LGA771,PLGA771 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N200 and Xeon X5355. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | + |
Security technologies
Processor N200 and Xeon X5355 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N200 and Xeon X5355 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N200 and Xeon X5355. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel | DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N200 and Xeon X5355.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.56 | 1.28 |
| Recency | 3 January 2023 | 14 November 2006 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 120 Watt |
Processor N200 has a 21.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 1900% lower power consumption.
The Processor N200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5355 in performance tests.
Be aware that Processor N200 is a notebook processor while Xeon X5355 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Processor N200 and Xeon X5355, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
