Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Processor N200

VS

Aggregate performance score

Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.56
Ryzen 9 7940HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
19.11
+1125%

Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms Processor N200 by a whopping 1125% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Processor N200 and Ryzen 9 7940HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2122308
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-Nno data
Power efficiency24.6151.67
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-N (2023)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$193no data

Detailed specifications

Processor N200 and Ryzen 9 7940HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed0.1 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Processor N200 and Ryzen 9 7940HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1264FP8
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N200 and Ryzen 9 7940HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataRyzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Processor N200 and Ryzen 9 7940HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N200 and Ryzen 9 7940HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N200 and Ryzen 9 7940HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channelDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N200 and Ryzen 9 7940HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes920

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Processor N200 1.56
Ryzen 9 7940HS 19.11
+1125%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Processor N200 3937
Ryzen 9 7940HS 7837
+99.1%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Processor N200 7549
Ryzen 9 7940HS 48751
+546%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Processor N200 3902
Ryzen 9 7940HS 15689
+302%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Processor N200 25.99
Ryzen 9 7940HS 2.7
+863%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Processor N200 3
Ryzen 9 7940HS 30
+1017%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Processor N200 219
Ryzen 9 7940HS 2661
+1115%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Processor N200 113
Ryzen 9 7940HS 284
+151%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Processor N200 1.36
Ryzen 9 7940HS 3.38
+149%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Processor N200 3.2
Ryzen 9 7940HS 15.1
+372%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Processor N200 2115
Ryzen 9 7940HS 7490
+254%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Processor N200 16
Ryzen 9 7940HS 144
+784%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Processor N200 80
Ryzen 9 7940HS 293
+266%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Processor N200 1540
Ryzen 9 7940HS 12111
+686%

Blender(-)

Processor N200 2150
+1038%
Ryzen 9 7940HS 189

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Processor N200 928
Ryzen 9 7940HS 1986
+114%

7-Zip Single

Processor N200 3230
Ryzen 9 7940HS 6652
+106%

7-Zip

Processor N200 7146
Ryzen 9 7940HS 71086
+895%

WebXPRT 3

Processor N200 171
Ryzen 9 7940HS 317
+85.1%

CrossMark Overall

Processor N200 614
Ryzen 9 7940HS 1797
+193%

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Processor N200 4297
+1295%
Ryzen 9 7940HS 308

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Processor N200 1660
Ryzen 9 7940HS 12348
+644%

Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core

Processor N200 956
Ryzen 9 7940HS 2662
+178%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.56 19.11
Integrated graphics card 3.29 18.32
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 35 Watt

Processor N200 has 483.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 7940HS, on the other hand, has a 1125% higher aggregate performance score, 456.8% faster integrated GPU, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 7940HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Processor N200 and Ryzen 9 7940HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Processor N200
Processor N200
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
Ryzen 9 7940HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 148 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 1019 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7940HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Processor N200 or Ryzen 9 7940HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.