Mobile Pentium III 1000 vs Processor 300
Primary details
Comparing Processor 300 and Mobile Pentium III 1000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1319 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 9.28 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Coppermine (1999−2001) |
| Release date | 8 January 2024 (less than a year ago) | 19 March 2001 (23 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $82 | $722 |
Detailed specifications
Processor 300 and Mobile Pentium III 1000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.9 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 32 KB |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | 163 mm2 | 106 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 28 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Processor 300 and Mobile Pentium III 1000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1700 | Intel Micro-BGA2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 46 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor 300 and Mobile Pentium III 1000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Processor 300 and Mobile Pentium III 1000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor 300 and Mobile Pentium III 1000 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor 300 and Mobile Pentium III 1000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 710 | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor 300 and Mobile Pentium III 1000.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 January 2024 | 19 March 2001 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 46 Watt | 25 Watt |
Processor 300 has an age advantage of 22 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.
Mobile Pentium III 1000, on the other hand, has 84% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Processor 300 and Mobile Pentium III 1000. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Processor 300 is a desktop processor while Mobile Pentium III 1000 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Processor 300 and Mobile Pentium III 1000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
