FX-6200 vs Phenom X4 9850 BE

Primary details

Comparing Phenom X4 9850 BE and FX-6200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1746
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data1.94
Architecture codenameAgena (2007−2008)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release dateMarch 2008 (16 years ago)27 February 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom X4 9850 BE and FX-6200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads46
Base clock speedno data3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)288 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)6144 KB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)8192 KB
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die size285 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data61 °C
Number of transistors450 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.3 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on Phenom X4 9850 BE and FX-6200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM2+AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom X4 9850 BE and FX-6200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X4 9850 BE and FX-6200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom X4 9850 BE and FX-6200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom X4 9850 BE and FX-6200.

PCIe versionno datan/a

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 6
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm

FX-6200 has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Phenom X4 9850 BE and FX-6200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom X4 9850 BE and FX-6200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom X4 9850 BE
Phenom X4 9850 BE
AMD FX-6200
FX-6200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 20 votes

Rate Phenom X4 9850 BE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 135 votes

Rate FX-6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom X4 9850 BE or FX-6200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.