Core 2 Extreme QX9650 vs Phenom X4 9650
Primary details
Comparing Phenom X4 9650 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2416 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 1.09 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Agena (2007−2008) | Yorkfield (2007−2009) |
| Release date | March 2008 (16 years ago) | November 2007 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom X4 9650 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 1333 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 12 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 285 mm2 | 2x 107 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 64 °C |
| Number of transistors | 450 million | 820 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V-1.3625V |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom X4 9650 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM2+ | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom X4 9650 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | + |
Security technologies
Phenom X4 9650 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X4 9650 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom X4 9650 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 130 Watt |
Phenom X4 9650 has 36.8% lower power consumption.
Core 2 Extreme QX9650, on the other hand, has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Phenom X4 9650 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom X4 9650 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
