EPYC 7252 vs Phenom X3 8750 BE
Primary details
Comparing Phenom X3 8750 BE and EPYC 7252 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 625 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 10.62 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 9.64 |
| Architecture codename | Toliman (2008) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| Release date | September 2008 (16 years ago) | 7 August 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $475 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Phenom X3 8750 BE and EPYC 7252 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 3 (Tri-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 3 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 31 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Die size | 285 mm2 | 192 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 450 million | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom X3 8750 BE and EPYC 7252 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | AM2+ | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom X3 8750 BE and EPYC 7252. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X3 8750 BE and EPYC 7252 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom X3 8750 BE and EPYC 7252. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.763 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 3 | 8 |
| Threads | 3 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 120 Watt |
Phenom X3 8750 BE has 26.3% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7252, on the other hand, has 166.7% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Phenom X3 8750 BE and EPYC 7252. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Phenom X3 8750 BE is a desktop processor while EPYC 7252 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom X3 8750 BE and EPYC 7252, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
