E1-2100 vs Phenom X3 8750 BE
Primary details
Comparing Phenom X3 8750 BE and E1-2100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | AMD E-Series |
Architecture codename | Toliman (2008) | Kabini (2013−2014) |
Release date | September 2008 (16 years ago) | 23 May 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom X3 8750 BE and E1-2100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 3 (Tri-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 3 | 2 |
Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1024 KB |
L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 28 nm |
Die size | 285 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 90 °C |
Number of transistors | 450 million | 1,178 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom X3 8750 BE and E1-2100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | AM2+ | FT3 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom X3 8750 BE and E1-2100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, BMI1, ABM, SVM, AES-NI |
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | - | FMA4 |
AVX | - | + |
PowerNow | - | + |
PowerGating | - | + |
VirusProtect | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X3 8750 BE and E1-2100 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom X3 8750 BE and E1-2100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 8210 |
Enduro | - | + |
Switchable graphics | - | + |
UVD | - | + |
VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Phenom X3 8750 BE and E1-2100 integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Phenom X3 8750 BE and E1-2100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom X3 8750 BE and E1-2100.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 3 | 2 |
Threads | 3 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 9 Watt |
Phenom X3 8750 BE has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
E1-2100, on the other hand, has a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 955.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom X3 8750 BE and E1-2100. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Phenom X3 8750 BE is a desktop processor while E1-2100 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom X3 8750 BE and E1-2100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.