Mobile A A110 vs Phenom X3 8550
Primary details
Comparing Phenom X3 8550 and Mobile A A110 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2693 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.13 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Mobile A |
| Architecture codename | Toliman (2008) | Stealey (2007) |
| Release date | April 2008 (16 years ago) | 4 June 2007 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $170 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Phenom X3 8550 and Mobile A A110 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 3 (Tri-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 3 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 0.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 285 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 450 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom X3 8550 and Mobile A A110 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM2+ | 663-ball micro-FCBGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 3 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X3 8550 and Mobile A A110 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 3 | 1 |
| Threads | 3 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 3 Watt |
Phenom X3 8550 has 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
Mobile A A110, on the other hand, has 3066.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom X3 8550 and Mobile A A110. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Phenom X3 8550 is a desktop processor while Mobile A A110 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom X3 8550 and Mobile A A110, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
