A9-9420 vs Phenom X3 8450

VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom X3 8450
2008
3 cores / 3 threads, 95 Watt
0.78
A9-9420
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.96
+23.1%

A9-9420 outperforms Phenom X3 8450 by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom X3 8450 and A9-9420 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26382505
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency0.765.94
Architecture codenameToliman (2008)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release dateApril 2008 (16 years ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom X3 8450 and A9-9420 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3 (Tri-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads32
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)160 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (shared)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography65 nm28 nm
Die size285 mm2125 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors450 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom X3 8450 and A9-9420 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM2+FT4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom X3 8450 and A9-9420. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X3 8450 and A9-9420 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom X3 8450 and A9-9420. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataRadeon R5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom X3 8450 and A9-9420.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom X3 8450 0.78
A9-9420 0.96
+23.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom X3 8450 1216
A9-9420 1498
+23.2%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Phenom X3 8450 256
A9-9420 325
+27%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Phenom X3 8450 703
+40.6%
A9-9420 500

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.78 0.96
Physical cores 3 2
Threads 3 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

Phenom X3 8450 has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

A9-9420, on the other hand, has a 23.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

The A9-9420 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom X3 8450 in performance tests.

Note that Phenom X3 8450 is a desktop processor while A9-9420 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom X3 8450 and A9-9420, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom X3 8450
Phenom X3 8450
AMD A9-9420
A9-9420

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 115 votes

Rate Phenom X3 8450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 510 votes

Rate A9-9420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom X3 8450 or A9-9420, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.