Celeron G6900T vs Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Aggregate performance score
Phenom II X6 1100T BE outperforms Celeron G6900T by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Celeron G6900T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1488 | 1734 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Power efficiency | 2.74 | 6.83 |
Architecture codename | Thuban (2010) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
Release date | 7 December 2010 (13 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Celeron G6900T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 6 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 80K (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | Intel 7 nm |
Die size | 346 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Number of transistors | 904 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Celeron G6900T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | AM3 | FCLGA1700 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Celeron G6900T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
TSX | - | + |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Celeron G6900T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Celeron G6900T are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Celeron G6900T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 76.8 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
Quick Sync Video | - | + |
Clear Video HD | no data | + |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.3 GHz |
Execution Units | no data | 16 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 4 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz |
Max resolution over eDP | no data | 5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | 12 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Celeron G6900T.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 and 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 3.75 | 2.62 |
Recency | 7 December 2010 | 4 January 2022 |
Physical cores | 6 | 2 |
Threads | 6 | 2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 35 Watt |
Phenom II X6 1100T BE has a 43.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.
Celeron G6900T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and 257.1% lower power consumption.
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G6900T in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Celeron G6900T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.