Athlon XP 1700+ vs Phenom II X6 1100T BE

VS

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Athlon XP 1700+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1488not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.74no data
Architecture codenameThuban (2010)Thoroughbred (2001−2002)
Release date7 December 2010 (13 years ago)October 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Athlon XP 1700+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads61
Base clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz1.47 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)256 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm180 nm
Die size346 mm2150 mm2
Number of transistors904 million37 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Athlon XP 1700+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3A
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt64 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Athlon XP 1700+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Athlon XP 1700+.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X6 1100T BE 5745
+3164%
Athlon XP 1700+ 176

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 6 1
Threads 6 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 64 Watt

Phenom II X6 1100T BE has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon XP 1700+, on the other hand, has 95.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Athlon XP 1700+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X6 1100T BE and Athlon XP 1700+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
AMD Athlon XP 1700+
Athlon XP 1700+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 457 votes

Rate Phenom II X6 1100T BE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 23 votes

Rate Athlon XP 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X6 1100T BE or Athlon XP 1700+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.