A4-7300 vs Phenom II X6 1100T BE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
3.62
+277%
A4-7300
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.96

Phenom II X6 1100T BE outperforms A4-7300 by a whopping 277% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-7300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15062502
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.741.40
Architecture codenameThuban (2010)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date7 December 2010 (14 years ago)August 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-7300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads62
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)96 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size346 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors904 million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-7300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3FM2
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-7300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-7300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-7300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1600
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 8470D
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data192
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-7300 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-7300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-7300.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X6 1100T BE 3.62
+277%
A4-7300 0.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X6 1100T BE 5745
+276%
A4-7300 1529

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.62 0.96
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 65 Watt

Phenom II X6 1100T BE has a 277.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

A4-7300, on the other hand, has a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

The Phenom II X6 1100T BE is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-7300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-7300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
AMD A4-7300
A4-7300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 459 votes

Rate Phenom II X6 1100T BE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 98 votes

Rate A4-7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X6 1100T BE or A4-7300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.